Find a Lawyer

TAHIR DIN versus ZAFAR ULLAH KHAN

Section 152, OI, R 10, O XX, R 14 (1) (b) and O XXI, R 35 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) submission of order in pre-emption suit within the prescribed time The order was not properly decided by the petitioners for the modification of the order according to the amount paid under it, without notice to the petitioners, a month after the trial court received the notice of its order. The application was instructed to instruct the collector of additional funds within, a decree on the deposit of additional funds to the learned persons, and then a request for execution by the decision-maker. That extra money was not deposited within the stipulated time was for the order takers to say that they were underage and a report on such notice was forged, in which their next friend refused to receive the notice. And that upon submission of the notice, upon submission of the notice, the court deposited the extra money in the Execution Court, and dismissed such objection. Upon the court's approval of the first appeal filed by the judgment, the suit was dismissed, according to the court's request, by transfer of the land. The second appeal filed by the judgment debtor should be processed as a party. The High Court dismissed the second appeal and the service of the relocation notice of the transfer justification notice could not be substantiated by the credible evidence, the court lender failed to collect the extra money. Was within a stipulated time, any writings or evidence relating to the coordination of the three courts under the Supreme Court. tax advocates from Sangote lawyer