LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus KHALID JAVED MAKHDOOM
Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for the plaintiff's declaration, the suit extended the construction on the suit land, a special part of which was developed by the Revenue Authority. But the entire area refused to waive the plaintiff because there was vacancy in the same place that the courts formally claimed that in the plaintiff's case, it was found that the suit was for the construction of the land. The reason is that he is fully entitled to a waiver. Under such a scheme as a matter of fact, the courts do not have to consider such statements as false statements, misinformation or any material evidence, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Harnai lawyer