Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE


Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The eyewitnesses were the most natural witnesses of the incident who, in a straightforward way, assembled each other on every material point and confirmed the truth. And inspire confidence. Ocular witnesses were confirmed by medical evidence in connection with the nature of the victim and the severity of the injuries in the statement of eye witnesses, the number of injuries had no material effect on the truth of their evidence. If the allegation was proved on the basis of other evidence, it was sufficient to prove the accused against the doubtful evidence, together with direct evidence and medical evidence of the unforgivable character. The accused appeals leave was denied under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Mangi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.