Find a Lawyer

ZAHID HUSSAIN ALIAS ZAHIDA versus STATE

Sections 302/34, 324/34 and 353/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) in the prosecution case raise any doubt or evidence in the prosecution. The statement is not contradictory and contradictory. The participant's identity and identity and his crime was available on record. In determining the suspect's guilt, the material facts are beyond doubt; witnesses were members of the police force who were attacked during patrol duty in the area; their presence on the scene was natural and they had no personal There was no reason or intention to substitute it for himself or for his superiors with the unknown culprit. The witnesses supported the trial case set up in the FIR, and without error or escalation, they clearly stated that the Kalashnikovs' accused and his accomplices fired at the policemen on the spot. As a result, A Section I and the constable lost their lives while the complainant and a constable fortunately survived, while direct and natural evidence of the injured witnesses substantiated the charge against the accused. Was granted and the appellant's leave was denied under the circumstances best advocate from Wana lawyer