WAHID BAKHSH versus DISTRICT OFFICER (R)/DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND) NOTIFIED OFFICER, DERA GHAZI KHAN
Section 10 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Mukhtar found that the principle of application of the right of voters, advance information in the case of respondent, was found correct and it was directed that the canceled land be obtained The name should be allotted. The Certified Claim Notified Officer passed an order and the canceled land in favor of the announcer was rejected by the applicant in 2004, in a constitutional petition, before the High Court, which Due to this the petition was targeted on the principle of litigation. If the order is not challenged within a reasonable time, a entitled legal right shall be granted to the person to whom the order was approved, after the approval of the moratorium application and the direction of the authorized authorities, in favor of the mukhtar. The land allotment had asserted a right of way over it. The respondent's son could not be deprived of the valuable legal right he received as a result of the negligence of the plea er. In the judgment passed by the High Court, the Supreme Court found no illegal or weak appeal against which An irrational leave was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Matiari lawyer