MST. SHARIF BIBI versus SYED MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHAH
Article 114 Estoppel Civil Cases Additional Crimes All parties stated before their trial before the trial court that they would like the matter to be decided by the referee according to their statement or report. Will not object to the decision. The trial court, after recording the statements of counsel for the parties, appointed the referee to the nominee and demanded that he file a report that was properly filed and the decision of the case as per his decision / report. was done. Adopt a procedure that is not considered by the Civil Code of Conduct, 1908. In fact, such a procedure is an additional charisma when the matter is pending under the jurisdiction of the civil court. The parties were able to agree to send the case to a referee for a decision of the suit and the court was able to agree on the jurisdiction of the trial court to appoint a referee and to object to the jurisdiction of the trial court. Set He had no legal basis for the decision of the case, the trial court was prevented by the trial court over the appointment of the referee and the matter to be referred to the referee because at the request of the party / protestors The actions were taken by the trial court. There are suits from other parties as well
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Doaaba lawyer