Find a Lawyer

DILAWAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 2 (b (b)) of the evidence was filed at the appropriate time, the eyewitnesses involved in the FIR naturally described the incident in accordance with the facts in which the medical evidence testified to the ocular evidence. At the time of the incident, the number and nature of the injuries and the weapon used by the accused in the absence of any rivalry or illicit will only exclude evidence from the relationship prosecution witnesses and similar witnesses. There was no reasonable basis for doing so, the non-residential locations were not such, just because of the unnatural witnesses and their evidence. Could not be excluded because the accused had a strong motive for committing the crime, there was no material contradiction or contradiction, which could also be seen as evidence of the truth of the prosecution's evidence. Evidence of acceptance was substantiated by the evidence that neither the ned-up nor the sudden incident suspect confirmed that he had no intention of killing the deceased or that the injury to his death was a direct result of his death. There was no consequence, yet the possibility of his survival did not reduce the responsibility of the accused and the death in the hospital did so for a while. Could have, like, for at least the situation is not considered and the appeal was dismissed famous supreme court advocate from Bajaur lawyer