SYED JUNAID AKHTAR versus MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN
A. XLI, R 19 The application for re-entry of the appeal was dismissed for illegal prosecution, at which time the lawyer's absence and the two counsel for the appellant were then summoned to hear the affidavit in favor of the application. They will only decide by the first lawyer because of this effect. After his wife's illness, the court could not be reached on time. The second appellant's lawyer was equally responsible for explaining his absence, and was equally responsible for filing an affidavit explaining his absence and pursuing the case for appellant's own support. Was dismissed due to a lawyer's circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
