Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT versus ROSHAN DEEN

Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 14, 15 and 185 (3) Constitution Petition for three months after the applicant's release of the applicant under the order of 29 10 2005 Federal and Provincial Governments Unlawful Applicant Deputy Superintendent of Unlawful Detention of Central Prisoner, submitted by the Provincial Home Department Department Officer, with a copy of the letter dated 18-3 2006, in which the petitioner further Orders for detention were sought, otherwise such letters indicate that another order was approved or pre-ordered without any detention. Whether the extension was required or in any other case would require the applicant, he had been in custody for more than two months, having knowledge of the superintendent prison, who had deliberately chosen to seek orders. ? En According to the constitution, the officers and the imperfect mandate of the constitution, according to the constitution, could not deprive him of liberty except that according to the law, the superintendent prisons closed the applicant in illegal custody and not just the law. Infringement, but it seemed appropriate to seek further directions from the relevant constituencies for his detention, which was not his business. The department had acted illegally by seeking directions from the federal government for extension of time and for further detention of the applicant, whose jail term had already expired, by the Supreme Court, rather than being a supporter of the constitution. Cannot be ignored or ignored. The legal duty of the courts was to defend and safeguard the constitutional guarantees and to bring the relevant authorities to the constitution. criminal advocate from Chiniot lawyer