TAHIR LATEEF SHEIKH versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Article 212 (3) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 15 and 25 (b) Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 3 of the National Accountability Bureau against the dismissal of a Service Officer. Action. Assets take the Treasury for $ 31 million through corruption or corruption. After considering the reading of section 15 (b) with section 15 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, entering into this agreement, the service (special powers) faced the rigors of disciplinary proceedings under the consideration of the Ordinance 2000. Had to Likewise, on the appeal, the Service Tribunal upheld the imposition of a major penalty for dismissal form service, the Validity Petitioner sought leave of appeal to suppress the violation of the Articles 13 and 25 of the Constitution, As the double jeopardy and discrimination disregarded the fact that the criminal proceedings were free from confiscation, while the two counters were later sentenced to compulsory retirement, the Supreme Court ruled in their extraordinary jurisdiction. The authority denied the interference that the application for leave of appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
