Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

QAMAR HAYAT KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM


Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) in the appeal against the acquittal by the High Court, the High Court examined the threadbare of all the evidence as per the record number of reasons. All the evidence available on the record was reviewed in support of this. The piece of evidence found in the prosecution was misidentified, omitted or not evaluated in its original context; the impugned decision on the incident was unimaginable and no facts. Or complained of no legal malpractice accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Shamsabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.