STATE versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM ALIAS ACHOO
Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Benefits of Evidence Suspicion Complainant in filing an FIR late in the eighteen hours requested a story for the accused to be taken into account. Was Some part of the prosecution's story about the injured buffalo and motions was dominant among the parties; no crime was left empty with 222 bore guns, the Ocular version was stabilized by medical reports, Eyewitnesses and witnesses of the recovery memoir were related to the deceased and the accused was outraged. No corroborative material was brought to the record from an independent source in support of the prosecutor's story; ocular testimony and retrieval evidence, thus, the district judge was unable to appreciate the aforementioned facts, while the session judge appealed. The decision was made by giving the judicial mind a right decision, it was alleged that the suspect was taken advantage of and acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer