Sections 302 (b) and 337A (1) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), section 13, immediately defined the evidence in which the accused were named and the clear role of each of them. Was quoted, the prosecution's testimony fully supported. The complainant's statement was filed on the day and time of day, the presence of both the accused on the spot, the presence of a gun in the hands of the principal accused and the firing on the victim with the same gun was safely entered in the defense section. The forensic science laboratory report alleged that the 12-bore gun was empty, the suspect was fired with a gun on reports of blood-stained land and was empty at the scene. The prosecution's witnesses testified to the incident, which proved that the incident took place in the territory that was in the possession of the complaining party. The site's plan only reinforced the case. The prosecutor, who also identified the location of the incident and the inquiry report, was in the nature of corroborative evidence. Medical evidence reinforced the prosecutor's story and the defendants did not deny the recovery. The ocular version of the prosecution's testimony was strongly supported. The prosecution's general account was clear, consistent, and true, with ample evidence to support the evidence, the defendant contradicted and took a different stand during the trial when both the prosecution and the defense version of the case had its true The context was set up, compiled by defense, it seemed impossible, false and mere eyewitnesses were found in the testimony of Adel Purity and the prosecution's witnesses, it was true and
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
