MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Sections 302 and 341 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 sentence defining evidence, showing no displeasure between the two men or reduction of material that indicates direct enmity between the accused and the victim, Despite the fact that the accused on record was fully aware of his death, the police officer did not record his death declaration or file his statement under Section 161, on behalf of the CR PC victim. Various copies of the case were shown to have been suppressed by the prosecution. Witnesses had established the prosecution's version of the crime. According to the report of the Nazik Science Expert, the evacuees were fired from the recovered arms at the suspect's report, however, the deployment of eyewitnesses to the incident was not permanent, two witnesses failed to know the man. The PPC had sustained a fatal injury under Section 2v2 under the PPC, but was sentenced to death under the circumstances but under the circumstances they were sentenced to life imprisonment. The accused was acquitted of the charge under Section 341, PPC, but his sentence was retained under the Arms Ordinance, under which the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Samma Satta lawyer