Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Definition of Sections 324, 337A, 337C, 337D, 341, 302 and 34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Evidence. Both the accused were convicted under Sections 324 and 337, PPC and Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, but they were acquitted of the charges under Sections 302 and 341, PPC, while the third accused was acquitted of all of them. The allegations were dismissed, when the defense request made by the defendants was neither taken by them during the trial nor at the time of their investigation, despite this section 342, CR PC Although several people were gathered at the scene during the incident, no one was presented with any claim to have the accused injured, no documentary or complaint. The evidence was not supported or fir, which once were their names appear. Details about the purpose of the accused, the victims and the witnesses, the location of the incident, the weapons used for the commission of the crime, the origin of the fighting and similar incidents were also given in the FIR. When Chaudhry was seized from the crime scene, 30 bore pistols and a cane were recorded on the defendant's plea that was brought on record in support of the ocular version, Medico legal reports say, prosecuting success story. Was proved with. The witnesses, with the help of the controversial Material Trial Court, reached the correct verdict in the circumstances. Was sentenced, however, under section 7337, the offender was found guilty of wrongdoing. O, PPC reported that the accused was Jaffa, and patent advocate from Sehwan lawyer