AZRA RIFFAT RANA versus SECRETARY, MINSITRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS, ISLAMABAD
OM No. F1 (8) R4 / 89, Dated 4 12, 1991 The concept of issuing an office memorandum by the Government, which provides for some months of residence and up to six months after the payment of compensation. And a large number of civil servants, including the appellant, took advantage of it, the government, in its conduct, disrupted it, saying that because the policy presented by the Office Memorandum is a violation of the Housing Allocation Rules 2002. , Because the government could not implement it. Every faith of the promise was binding on the promise, and the question of assurance contained in the office memorandum does not extend to the legislative and sovereign functions of Estoppel, even though executive orders are not excluded from its operation. The appellant was entitled to retain official residence at the age of greatness in terms of the office memo and remand for six months thereafter, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the allotment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Gari Mori lawyer
