Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AHMAD versus MIAN EJAZ HUSSAIN

Section 152 (e) Election of Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, ARI 14 and 65 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1996 Educational Qualification of nomination papers of nominee and deputy nominee candidates, excluding the appeal of the respondents Filed against accepting applicant's nomination papers by the Returning Officer, the Controller of Examination found the Matriculation Certificate to be inappropriate for the actual applicant upon seeing such record - sorry for his client. And he didn't say a word in his defense. To which the High Court accepted the respondents' request of the Constitutional Applicant that the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction cannot decide the contentious question, which can be decided by an election petition after the recording of the Election Tribunal evidence. Counting respondents did not have the opportunity, after challenging the proceedings, and could not ascertain whether the applicant was eligible to contest the election. Respondents can take advantage of the available legal remedies. The impeachment decision was based on a precise definition of facts and the law would lose its significance on the instability of the constitutional petition. The Supreme Court dismissed the statement of the petitioner's counsel before the High Court at a special cost of Rs 10,000, while instructing the Intermediate and Secondary Education Board to initiate criminal proceedings against the applicant before the police. The receiving court will issue a verdict. Send a copy of the decision and the decision to the Registrar through the Supreme Court within a stipulated time. \ r \ n family advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer