MUHAMMAD ALI RIAZ versus MST. NASIM NAZIR AHMED SULTAN
Article 125 (1973) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 appeals to the Supreme Court suit for specific performance of the contract, the trial court and the appellate court, respectively, filed the case, but the High Court rejected the decision, stating that Numerous decisions and orders were dismissed and appellant dismissed Appeal against the judgment of the High Court jurisdiction The High Court found that there was material contradiction in the evidence presented by the appellant and for the appellant. The lawyer failed to explain the stance because it was said that there was a contradiction in the face of the record. Revenue records were not presented for the corresponding year. To show that the appellant had obtained possession of the suit land as soon as the trial court executed the sale agreement, as well as that the first appellate court had erred in recording incorrect recordings and material evidence Fault or None \ Legal decision was found in the High Court decision to guarantee interference by the Supreme Court. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer