MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE
Section 7 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) restoration of evidence 222 The recovery of bore rifle ply was taken by the accused that the rifle was not in his possession at the date of the recovered sign; the recovery witnesses were all permanent. ? During the investigation of the time, place and procedure of the recovery of the illegal arm, it was not advised that any recovery evidence was unnecessary against the accused only in his statement recorded under Section 342 CCPC. That this case was wrong. And was filed under the influence of the former MPA. Such a request was taken too far to raise suspicion in the prosecution case. The prosecutor proved his case beyond reasonable doubt that the law was relevant. No question was raised and the trial court sentenced him to ten years in prison. The Supreme Court's leave to appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer