Find a Lawyer

QAIM SHAH versus STATE

Section 9 (c) defines evidence, reduced the recovery of 13 kilograms and 600 grams of hashish and recovered one kilogram opium 9 kg from the male accused and 600 grams of hash from the accused in various packets, the two accused were unrelated to the prosecution. There was no enmity or malice to falsely include the witnesses of the accused, the prosecution's witnesses were impressed with the conviction and conviction, with such a large quantity of narcotics from the individual accused in terms of time, place and location of drug recovery. Recovery was honestly impacted. While the conviction of both the accused was upheld, the sentence of life imprisonment was also limited to 10 years. property advocate from Jamshoro lawyer