MIRZA INAYAT BAIG REPRESENTED, BY MUHAMMAD ASLAM BAIG versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS
Contains the upper floor house and shop in the IQE property for Section 42 of the IQEA Property and Homelessness Act (XIV of 1975), Sections 2 and 3 of the Declaration Department of the PTD in 1973. Source moved to claimant. The plaintiff was sued in 1984 for declaring the owner of the shop roof as part of her home, and in her use the trial court's yard suit was dismissed by the Court of Appeal and the High Court justified. Was not on record to show that the roof of the shop by the Department of Settlement was designated as the courtyard of the plaintiff's house, instead of dealing with the settlement at the relevant time or at any other stage. A lawsuit for indirect relief from the PTD amendment was filed. The application was dismissed by the IQQ Laws Supreme Court. petition r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Timergara lawyer