Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN BABAR versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 52 of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 225 and 199 constitutional jurisdiction is included in the jurisdiction of Article 225 of the Constitution and the dispute arising from the election, after the issuance of notification of the result. The election, which must be brought before the Election Tribunal under Section 52 of the Public Representation Act 1976, is not an appropriate way to remedy constitutional petition through election petition and under Article 199 of the Constitution which has the jurisdiction bar in Article 252. The constitution of the High Court relating to indirect or indirect election in all cases cannot be excluded, in certain cases, which can be construed as a net, under Article 199 of the Constitution. The question is The constitutional petition raises the law and the question of fact or a mixed question of law is not involved in the fact, questions related to the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, in the election matters under Article 199 of the Constitution. In the light of the facts and circumstances of each case should be decided as a concept of being. The High Court's jurisdiction may not have the wisdom of the High Court as well as the Constitution Election Commission. In the present case, the exercise of record examination observed that in light of the nature of the dispute, the applicant, the High Court. Instead of taking the constitutional jurisdiction of the case, in the light of the facts of the present case, the election petition should benefit from the Supreme Court's referendum, and the parties' proposals rejected by the High Court differed \ r \ n immigration advocates from Goular Khel lawyer