Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 1 (a) Re-review evidence of triple murder evidence Extra judicial confession The trial court convicted the accused, sentenced by the accused It was affirmed by the High Court that in no case can anyone be convicted and sentenced to death. Such plea was misquoted because the evidence was rebutted when the crime series was concluded and the crime had a disputed conclusion. If the suspect was linking the commission to the commission without any doubt, if the evidence on the circumstances of the record were of this nature, it would have resulted in a final sentence, and in this case no other consequence of imagination. Cannot conclude. The accused, the death sentence or life imprisonment will be a common occurrence in the present case as the evidence of the prosecution witnesses proved and the accused failed to lose their credibility, so additional prosecution was made before the prosecution witnesses, who were charged The accused was considered to be a respected person for his assistance, and could not be denied when he was discharged on oath before the trial. The crime from the accused's mouth yielded other controversial and proportional evidence that the evidence was available to the accused by the accused, the evidence of which is on file. It proves that it is the act of the accused, who committed the disgusting crime of killing an innocent girl and two women. The evidence of the accused, who not only cut the throat of two women but also the events and circumstances of the four-month-old baby, proved that the accused was the person who committed the cold murder. Supreme Court upholds sentence immigration advocates phone number from Chak Jamal lawyer