MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appeals filed by the applicants were excluded from the appeal of the service tribunal on the basis that they were 120 from the date of expiry due to the same period of restriction. Was not filed within days. Departmental appeals filed by the applicants before the authorized authority were not ordered and on the reminder, the applicants were not informed of the decision to the authority, the applicants were informed that their department appeals to the service. Appeals filed before the Tribunal's Services Tribunal were rejected within 30 days of receipt of communication. Applicants' court appeals were rejected, it cannot be said that the tribunal's finding could be time-barred, that the appeals filed by the applicants were timely banned, not sustained. Could Placed aside and appeals for the same decision regarding Mir were sent to the tribunal after hearing the parties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Lasbela lawyer