Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.


Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appeals filed by the applicants were excluded from the appeal of the service tribunal on the basis that they were 120 from the date of expiry due to the same period of restriction. Was not filed within days. Departmental appeals filed by the applicants before the authorized authority were not ordered and on the reminder, the applicants were not informed of the decision to the authority, the applicants were informed that their department appeals to the service. Appeals filed before the Tribunal's Services Tribunal were rejected within 30 days of receipt of communication. Applicants' court appeals were rejected, it cannot be said that the tribunal's finding could be time-barred, that the appeals filed by the applicants were timely banned, not sustained. Could Placed aside and appeals for the same decision regarding Mir were sent to the tribunal after hearing the parties

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Gawadar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.