Find a Lawyer

MAJID MAHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Article 188 Regarding the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R 1, the applicant reviewed the decision not to affect the principles of the Supreme Court decision, however, while delivering the decision, the Supreme Court considered the facts. In the jurisdiction of unconfirmed review, this does not mean that the matter will be heard again and since the order was finalized, even though the decision was erroneous, there was no scope for justifying its review. Notwithstanding, the review was useless in reviewing the scope of the jurisdiction, which was subject to review, on the grounds of the decision. Before there can be any basis for reviewing an error, it was important to have one that was clear on the record face, so clear and clear that no court could allow it. Is. To be on the record, a mistake may be a fact or a mistake, but it must be an error that is self-evident and floating around, and does not require any interaction or rat action. iocination If the court had made a conscious and deliberate decision about a particular law or fact when dealing with an application or appeal, the judgment or ruling could not have been reviewed on the basis that the court erred or It was also possible to review the second theory based on the discovery of some new material, which could not be allowed to review, if such material was available at the time of appeal or appeal but did not present applicant's convictions. If done, there was nothing to reiterate on the basis of the appeal hearing on the grounds that best law firms from Panjan Kisan lawyer