FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus FLT. LT. FARRUKH RASHID
Section 4 Abolition of Appeal Service Vacant posts in Police Service allocated to officers of Armed Forces require a seat for PAF in Inter Services quota, PAF officers prepared by Public Service Commission Appellant was shown in serial number 2 for the Army Army Merit List. Another officer in Serial No.1 was denied appointment after the High Court decision, thus, the appellant was placed on top of qualified PAF officers after the completion of training by the Assistant Superintendent of Police (B17). Termination of Appellant Services on Appointment Appointment Appointment Appointment of appellate jurors in favor of a competitor for the Navy's seat was neither challenged nor challenged by any other competitor. For the seat, which was not issued an appointment offer, approached the High Court, but became a Pak Navy seat For the success of the Supreme Court contenders in getting their verdict in the favor of the appellant aggravated their right to appeal, in accordance with the principle of quota policy, which would prevent any appointment of appellant against a specific seat for PAF officers. Was unrelated, the appellant's favor was formulated and the principle of locus affinity was in favor of the appellant, the appellant's constitutional right on the basis of both deserving of reinstatement of appellant was restored under the circumstances. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Fateh Pur lawyer