MST. SURRYA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD MANSHA
Article 324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the suspension order was dismissed within twenty days of the dismissal of his first application for unconditional withdrawal and the suspension of the sentence. New request moved. Without disclosing any fresh ground and giving the required certificate in the application circle without having already filed an application for relief and the matter was withdrawn after discussing it at length, the High Court said. The fresh plea was allowed through an unlawful order, which created the inevitable impression that the previous plea was concealed and withheld from the court, which in itself deprived the accused of the alleged benefits. That was enough even for reasons that led to the suspension with the High Court. The convictions were open to serious exceptions and at this stage it cannot be decided that there is no harm in the Investigation Officer who stated that it was absolutely plausible or unacceptable because of the hearing. And the investigating officer's question was not a privilege. The order of summary suspension in favor of the accused is summarily withdrawn
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer