Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD BUTT versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), DISTRICT GUJRANWALA

Article 188 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Delaying the Supreme Court's decision in filing Section 5 petition, affirmed the petitioner's request for relief and the petitioner filed a petition seeking review of the decision of the Supreme Court. Under which the Supreme Court turned the application into an appeal and the unauthorized orders were granted and the application was stayed for 4 days and the petitioner filed a delayed plea because he was unemployed. Was not in a position to contact his lawyer to prepare and file a second application, the petition The ground canvas delay for condolences by the petitioner did not cause sufficient delay within the parameters of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The delay cannot be confirmed by the delay, in the event that the delay was also waived. Yet there was no case on the applicant's eligibility or either the competitor's hearing presented by his lawyer was already resolved and the decision was made by the petitioner of the Supreme Court, who had already received the required relief. The whole case will not be allowed to be re-opened under the request for a review because the scope of the review is very limited. A. tax advocates from Chaman lawyer