Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE


Sections 302 (b) / 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (2) (a) and 10 (11a) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 9, 10 (1) and 185 (3). The accused was placed in absentia and without being given a chance to be heard, he was charged with violating Arts 9 and 10 (1) of the Constitution and Section 10 (11A) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. There was a hearing, both were sentenced. In the absence of the accused, the following courts, therefore, were not sustained under the law and the trial re-hearing required that the appeal be changed as a result of the leave appeal which was accepted and the trial court Sentenced and convicted and retained. Was set aside by the High Court and the remand for fresh trial was obtained as per the law of the accused on trial remand.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Jaffarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.