Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IJAZ versus MUHAMMAD AMIR

Section 302 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reappraisal of the evidence The deceased witness was declared by the trial court under Sec. 3030 (a) PPC and it was The sentence was upheld by the High Court Player. It was raised by the accused that the prosecution's witnesses belonged to the deceased, hence their testimony is not credible The plea raised by the accused was that the weapons of the offense could not be relied upon because the crime after recovery. The vacancy was sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory. Validating the weapons of the crime, my relationship with the prosecution's witnesses with the deceased will not make them an interesting and unreliable witness, given the injured statement which was confirmed by the doctor and according to the doctor, the deceased can make the statement. The deceased was treated as a dying declaration in which he specifically accused the defendant of effectively firing rescue crews on the spot before the gun was recovered. The fire was sent to the science laboratory which, after its recovery, the fire arms auditor's report was sent that The blank corresponds to the gun that confirmed the prosecution's evidence. The version was not properly believed because no record was supported by the Record High Court on proper scrutiny and the testimony of the evidence was maintained on the record while the conviction and sentence of the accused Supreme Court had no error in the verdict. Neither was there any concession. The same appeal was denied on leave top advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer