Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD

Sections 42 (11) (12) and 44 (2) (a) (1) of the Supreme Court Appellate Appeals are acting as Deputy Superintendent of Police while Assistant on Promotion on the basis of current charge. The post of Inspector General of Police was promoted. An order was filed against the post of the appellant which had to be vacated due to the retirement of one of the employers but it was said that the notification regarding the progress of the appellant, however, was canceled on the following day. An earlier notification regarding the promotion of the appellant was issued. Was to be issued by the Secretary Services and General Administration Department, while also issued by the Secretary of the Interior Office, the accuracy record has revealed that the order to cancel the appellant's development notification was issued without notice or approval to the Prime Minister. Went, which can only be done on the note filed by the subordinate workers, when the Prime Minister was informed of the facts, he ordered the revival of the order appellant's motion which canceled the order / notification. Under which the promotion of the appellant was canceled when the subordinate workers appointed the Minister If the wrongdoing did not follow the directions of the appellant, the appellant filed a writ petition in which it was approved to instruct the government officials to implement the Prime Minister's order. , But neither the Prime Minister's order was obeyed nor the High Court's directive could not be enforced or enforced, yet the appellant has been appointed by the Government's subordinate officers in this regard. I constantly followed, writing the mandamus advocate from Eminabad lawyer