Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM AKHTER versus MAQBOOL HUSSAIN

Judgment of Judicial Rule 22 of the Shariat Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Shariat Court (Code of Conduct) was transferred from one place to another by a Judge of Judicial Rule 22 of the Rules of 1982, usually hearing the case. ? Unless otherwise instructed by the Chief Justice in the original seat of the court, this means that the matter may be heard in the other place only by the direction of the Chief Justice of the Shariat Court, so only the Chief Justice. This is the only way the Shariah court can transfer. The matter was not competent and competent to do so from one sitting to another and the judge of the Shariah Court, and he erroneously transferred the case without jurisdiction, unless otherwise, the Shariat Court Judge requested Listen to it after giving permission. The applicant should have adjourned the matter for postponement, but at the same time he accepted the respondent's request for transfer of the case on the same day without any profession. Transfer of hearing opportunities to the applicant should have been applied only after hearing from both parties and the applicant could not be condemned. An unconstitutional Shariah court order was set aside in the circumstances and a review petition was accepted. best advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer