Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus TARIQ MAHMOOD

The benefit of the doubt was not recovered from the scene of the incident and the inquiry report or the Injury Sheet were not placed before the court, as such element was suspected to have occurred and occurred at the scene. Was created by the prosecution in the trial. Support for this version, which clearly meant that the prosecutor's view was that he would not support his version, the very first day, a counter-version was requested by the defendant, and the Investigation Officer's statement said The Anti-Investigation Officer was legally obliged to consider and investigate the above version, but this was not done in C. However, who had clearly disclosed that the police had investigated, the former party police had been investigating the matter. Regardless of whether he committed the crime or not and the police are not considering another version where a version was adopted. It was not possible for the accused and the court that the given version of the accused was not at all wrong, then the benefit of the doubt was that the accused went to the accused and was examined by the doctor, which led to the suspicion. ? Even if the prosecution did not prove the prosecution's evidence otherwise, the testimony of the witnesses did not prove the story of the firearms report, the expert prosecutor's story is not without doubt. The prosecution has failed to prove the case against the accused. Through the trial court and the Shariat court, the suspects were set aside for any suspicion, conviction and punishment and in the circumstances, the accused was given a free sentence. law websites from Jamrud Road lawyer