MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Section 168 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 XXV of 2000), Sections 9, 10, and 11 Vehicle-related questions were caught by the customs authorities on suspicion of trafficking and under the previous order. After being dismissed by the Collector / Appeal by the seized complainant / owner, the complainant filed an appeal before the Customs Appellate Tribunal which was decided in favor of the complainant when the vehicle was stolen. An FIR was registered and the police arrested the thief and recovered the Additional Sessions Judge complained to the vehicle to confirm his credentials. After the order to return the car to sprdry. The computer printout from the customs house also proved that the car was legally imported by the customs authorities, however, it did not return. Even after the tribunal's decision in favor of the complaint, the evidence produced by the complainant on the vehicle record for the complainant had fully proved that the complainant had legally imported the underpowered vehicle, but nevertheless Complainant suffered twice. Once through car lifters who stole his car and changed his chase number. And secondly, the customs authorities whose investigations failed mightily to come to the right conclusion were recommended that the Federal Board of Revenue formally investigate whether customs officers failed to do justice to the case. Are. That the Federal Board of Revenue will also examine the accuracy of adjudication dates and to decide the matter in a hurry. Sale of vehicle at nominal price of Rs 25,000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
