Find a Lawyer

CONVENIENCE FOOD INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 10 and 55 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the XXV), sections 2 (3) and 10 (3) of corruption were filed against sales tax authorities for failing to make several decisions on fourteen sales tax return claims. had gone. Several years ago; I refused to accept five other refund claims. And some refund claims were not approved by the Collector (Appeal), but the complainant was also enraged by the extraordinary delay in thirteen customs duty claims, according to the Customs House Export Collector The customs authorities explained in view of the specific circumstances. Charges for refunds and duty refunds by tax authority and inappropriate delays in removing files from file, filing a complaint late, suitable for investigation under section 10 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Was. Responses are sent to the Revenue Division, officials responded and recommendations were made in light of the response, suggesting that the issues were due to a serious error, delays in filing a refund claim and files. Wrong indications, etc. have to be fixed. In addition to the removal of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, which was processed under R, Collector Sales Tax and Collector Customs (Exports) should be instructed to enter their premises so that the taxpayers can return to them from the hassles and hassles available. In order to ensure that the responsibility is met. Required action for overpayment should be completed within a specified period online advocate from Minchanabad lawyer