Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus

Sections 9, 10, 11 (1) (B) (2), 53 (1) (C) and the Second Schedule Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), sections 10 and 11 exemptions The complainant alleged that while correcting his wife's income from the property, the complainant stated that his wife had declared income from the property and at the time of making the assessment she was required to pay the expenses of the payment of cantonment tax. An exemption of Rs 150,000 was not given. Correct tax benefits and provisions 53 (1) (c) and clause (1) relating to tax related to elderly citizens provided in clause (1A) of Part III of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Was not received as. A) Income Tax Ordinance, Part III of the Second Schedule of 2001, showed that under the ordinance a relief was provided by any person in respect of taxable tax payable and he was given salary or any special The income tax was not limited to or the provisions of the UP Taxes of Sections 9, 10, 11 (1) (b) and (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 made it absolutely clear that the permit under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 No taxpayer can be exempted from the tax deduction provided. The Federal Tax Ombudsman whose income falls in the Preparatory Tax Regime recommends that the FBR consider the complainant's claim in light of Sections 9, 10, 11 (1) (B) and 11 (2). Go Schedule III of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, and make a similar decision on the merit within the specified period; issuance of clarifications as required by law to prevent such complaints / litigation; and to provide special assistance to the elderly citizens. About the guidelines continue us immigration advocates from Kotri lawyer