Article 5, Schedule and 14 of the Muslim Marriages Act (VIII of 1939), Sections 2 (II), (IV), (viii) For the dissolution of marriage and the restoration of marital rights, the trial wife has to dissolve the marriage before the Family Court. Filed a lawsuit. Due to the cruelty, non-payment of restitution allowance, non-payment of marital obligations, and replacement of marital rights were substituted for the husband and wife, and on the basis of this the petitions were moved from contempt of court to the other. During the marriage the second marriage agreement was made. The family court passed a decree on dissolution of the marriage on the basis of khula, was considered as khula, and the case filed by the husband for the restoration of marital rights was dismissed, the wife in her case He also said in his statement that the jewelry was taken away by the husband, and he did not reject the wife's version in cross examination, according to which he admitted that the fact that the witnesses had the wife The wife supported the family court's version, considering the circumstances in which the parties truly appreciated that the decision to dissolve the marriage was considered Without approval. And it was not permissible for the husband to take anything back from his wife, especially when it was due to a mistake by Khulla's husband in the present case, the husband's fault was that he took the jewelry. And separated him from his wife. The Family Court unknowingly disclosed that no illegal act was committed by the Khulla-based marriage decree, and it also disclosed
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
