Sections 302 and 452 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Martyrdom of the Legislature (10 of 1984), Article 129 (G) of the Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) of Qatam Emad, domestic preparation after preparation. ? Appealing against the repeat complaint of the evidence, the assault or the illegal sanctions, he simply revealed that his son had told him about the incident on a mobile phone, but his claim In support of, the complainant did not produce a mobile phone, or no call data, no evidence of the presence of the accused prior to the incident, or after the presence of the complainant claimed that the deceased was his wife, but, She did not present the bride or the groom's witness in her complaint. In the circumstances, it could not be proved that the victim was his wife, two minor witnesses of the incident were not presented to record their evidence, from which a strong speculation was made against the prosecutor. Example of Dean Article 129 (c) The testimony of the law, 1984, did nothing to prove that the alleged offenses were made through statements of the prosecution witnesses, the complainant, the investigating officer, and other prosecution witnesses. , Could not bring any record-based record against the accused. No criminal weapon was recovered from this person, or no judicial or extra-judicial confession on the suspect's identity was in the record to prove guilt, though he did not appear in court, but his accompanying orders were absent. Was not prohibited under the law, once the offender was acquitted by a court of competent jurisdiction, he would be twice as likely to be found guilty of an offense.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
