Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA

Article 100 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 42 South claimed the rights of a 30-year-old plaintiff's document claiming that the suit land by way of private distribution was the sole possession of their ancestors and their ancestors. I've arrived. The possession of the suit land as the owner and the revenue record entries as the owners in the name of the plaintiff should be declared illegal and liable. He had corrected in favor of the plaintiffs, both the trial and the appellate court The lawsuit was dismissed for instability. The documents, which were thirty years old, were not registered documents, but they presented evidence of the fact that Article 100 of the Act, 1984, was applied in this case because the documents were in proper custody according to the evidence. Which was said to have been written on the documents. `` The stamp papers in the Dogra Regime, which did not appear to be forgery in the document they recited, appear genuine, the court has no hesitation in presenting the said document as the original document submitted by the defendants for 30 years. There is old evidence, she was not supporting her claim and she could not encourage the trust under which the following courts had put proportional decisions together and an order was issued in favor of the plaintiff as per the claim. Was done \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Kallur Kot lawyer