NASEER AHMED versus HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH PRESIDENT
Section 2 (6) and 30 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the request for dismissal of section 31 service of the Labor Appellate Legislative Assembly of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly and the Appellant from the Council who are employed Dismissed had filed a complaint under section 30 before the employer in the Jammu and Kashmir Industrial Relations Ordinance 1974, counsel for the employers / banks of the Labor Court for the dismissal order dismissed that the appellant was a bank employee. He was not an employee and his request is not eligible and who is the AJK Legislative Assembly or AJK No legislation was not to take any legislative competence to employees of banks and other corporations whose property was under their control. For the employer / bank, the power of legality was beyond any power. The ideology of Section 31 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, both the Assembly of the Azad Jammu and the Legislature had the power to legislate the trade unions in their allotted areas of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Industrial Relations Ordinance 1974, Manages relationships between employer and employee and resolves disputes and disputes between them. It is suspected that the banks operating in Azad Jammu and Kashmir were not under the direct control of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council and the Government, but in Azad Jammu and Kashmir the company's rules were adopted and the company was working to fulfill the purpose of the laws. These, banks had to file their own laws, which established labor courts and appellate tribunals to redress employee grievances, and employers were legally allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
