Find a Lawyer

REHMAN BEGUM versus HASSAN MUHAMMAD

O V1I, R 2 & O IX, R 2 suit for recovery of money by the trial court against the decision of the trial court and the appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order also appealed. Was excluded by The first appellate court filed a second appeal on behalf of the High Court, but the appellate court did not enter the correct address of the respondents and did not comply with the order of the court under OIX, R 2. Was not used. O IX, R 2, CPC stated that the provision of law is not compulsory in nature to exclude from the plaintiff for failure to register the defendant's correct address for service, to dismiss the case under O IX, R 2. In the event that the penalty is not guaranteed. The CPC case should be decided on a merit and the decision on the rights of the parties was at an early stage and the plaintiff was given only one opportunity to enter the correct seminary. It was in the interest of justice to decide the merits of the case and not the appellate court's impound order on technical grounds, and remand the appellate court to render a fresh verdict on the merits of the case and give the plaintiff an opportunity. Was obtained. To enter the correct address of the respondent famous high court advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer