ABDUL REHMAN versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION KARIANWALA
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2), alleges illicit racketeering raids, a food inspector allegedly accepted bribes from a depot holder magistrate, when the statement said When the money was being offered, the accused also refused to accept it and that there was a dispute between the complainant and the first informant and that the money was finally accepted by the accused but the complainant handed over to his partner. Cordy, as reported in the first information, but in examining it, said that he had made some false statements before. Police have also clearly indicated statements of the prosecution witnesses that the accused was not willing to accept the illegal pleas before the raid proceedings after the magistrate's confirmation by the defense witnesses accused of black marketing Chinese Was charged. His ration depot prosecution case, based on the defense of the juxtaposition, concluded that the prescription offered by the defense was a more exceptional prosecutor, thus failing to substantiate his case beyond reasonable doubt against the accused. And the sentence was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
