Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXVII, R5 Appellant, a contracting treasurer who issued a notice for the collection of embezzlement stamps, challenged its legal status. And by demanding his request, he was neither given show cause notice nor was he involved in the proceedings and in the inquiries in which it was questioned whether the appellant's agent was involved in the stamping case. It was decided that the appellant was liable to pay the money because his alleged agent committed the fraud. Providing no opportunity for the appellant to join the investigation before determining whether the appellant's agent was responsible and to what extent he was responsible and what amount of money could be obtained from the appellant. And the need for fair play has not been met. One of the questions was ordered to pay and appellant's suit [Natural Justice, Rule
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
