TARIQ MIR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD
Section Writ 44 Right Petition Contract Rights was brought in by the Contracting Department without the invitation of a tender and a request for a plea and mood call was approved which was not recognized in the eyes of the law. It was said that the contract was executed by a department official. On the day after his transfer, the act was not legally authorized to contract with a private person and he had no authority to enter into an agreement without the permission of his department's top officials. And was not permitted in any way to invalidate the contract, and no further action was taken by the officers of the department to legalize the contract, in the eyes of the law, The objection is that the writ petition cannot lie about the rights of the contract. , Was unable to be maintained because the High Court, using its constitutional jurisdiction, had the authority to examine the integrity of the order in connection with the ratification of the contract and, consequently, to instability, unfairness and lack of transparency. Was providing this challenge. Was made promptly and did not include factual question In this case there was no question of fact and the petitioner had not filed a writ petition to enforce the contract, if this law was not without legal authority What would have been the ingredients if the law had been violated. In the present case, the department's behavior in the present case was on record and it cannot be said that the applicant was not the aggressor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
