Find a Lawyer

SYED SARFRAZ IHUSSAIN NAQVI versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD

The ordinance petitioners questioned the wording of the ordinance petitioner (AJ) on the authority of the Assembly of the Legislative Assembly of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Articles 31, 41 and 44 of the Constitution. ? And Kashmir Red Crescent Branch (Extension of Scope, Scope and Functions) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2007, without Legislative Capacity and Section (1), Clause (a), (b), (c) of Section 31 The petitioner's counsel for Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, when enforced in violation, says that neither the Legislative Assembly nor the Council has taken over control of the Pakistan Red Crescent Society, JJ & B's. And the President has the power to legislate, as he is likewise excluded from his ability to legislate in terms of clause (a) (d) of section 31 (3) of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, K The same was compelled to be ousted from power under section 31 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, both the Council and the Assembly listed in subsections (1), (b) and (c) in subsection (1). The authority to legislate in relation to matters was entrusted. ) Under Section 31 (2) of Section 31 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, Section 31 of the Interim Constitution Act 1974, the Council was given the exclusive power to legislate in relation to all matters listed in the Legislative List. ? The third schedule, when the assembly was not in session, could be legislated by the President through the issuance of the ordinance, if he was satisfied that there were circumstances which required immediate action. , The request was deleted. Under the circumstances law websites from Dadu lawyer