In the appeal against the test of the plaintiff's counsel's verdict for sections 417 and 342 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 324 and 506/34 of the appellant / complainant, it was claimed that during the statement under section 342 the trial. The court, CRP, did not inquire into the allegation. The defendants / FIRs were against the accused and in the circumstances violated the procedure laid down under Section 2, 2, the PC statement stated under Section 2342, the CRPC filed a case against Depending on the relevant law, Section 342, relating to the CRPC's statement of the accused, was taken to the trial of section 2342, the CRPC had to see if the accused had applied himself. The purpose of the evidence was to provide the accused with an opportunity to explain the evidence leveled against him and not the allegations in the FIR. Of After thorough understanding of the statement made by the complainant / appellant under Section 342, CR PC, it was felt that the relevant evidence was kept for the accused to appear as if the error did not appear to be a trial. The order passed by the court was allowed to stand
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
