Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FEROZE PUNJANI versus SYED BADSHAH HUSSAIN

A. XLI, R 19 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 1868 Appeals to the Appeal Lawyer for a three (3) day delay in filing an appeal for a restitution of the appeal supported by the lawyer's personal affidavit. Done. Upon his admission, the appellant failed to submit the data as instructed by the court, and his lawyer requested restitution in the form of arbitrary relief, refusing to submit a similar grant, Could have been given. A vigilance and respect for court orders was punctual, but the appellant did not delay the petition under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Refused to approve

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• PIYAR ALI v. AHSAN GONDHAL 2014 YLR 53
• ROYAL AIRPORT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence 2014 PLD 60
• MURAD UR REHMAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 61
• QAMDEEN BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. v. Mrs. SHIRLEY AMIRUDDIN VALIKA 2014 YLR 66
• Mst. NISHAT ISHAQ v. AMJAD KHAN 2014 CLC 71
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Housing and Town Planning 2014 MLD 73
• PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED through Major (R) Zia Ahmed Jan v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2014 PLC 77
• LIAQUAT ALI v. AKHTAR SULTAN 2014 PLD 78

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

us immigration advocates from Zhob lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes