Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH MAJOR (R) ZIA AHMED JAN versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Applicants to the section 53 and (G (?) complaint) for counseling employees of the Labor Court Power to enforce the attendance of any person advised that no oral evidence was filed by the Labor Court. The affidavits were submitted by the parties to the evidence, and the evidence was then cross-examined on the basis of these affidavits when the Labor Court was appointed to enforce the attendance of any person and examine it on oath. Had the necessary powers, in the present case, affidavits were filed in the evidence and both councils had no other party Objection to Affidavits in Evidence When he appeared for cross-examination, the affidavit was withdrawn and it was confirmed that in the presence of such cases the object was lost by the employer's lawyer, losing his power.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• QAMDEEN BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. v. Mrs. SHIRLEY AMIRUDDIN VALIKA 2014 YLR 66
• MUHAMMAD FEROZE PUNJANI v. Syed BADSHAH HUSSAIN 2014 PLD 70
• Mst. NISHAT ISHAQ v. AMJAD KHAN 2014 CLC 71
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Housing and Town Planning 2014 MLD 73
• LIAQUAT ALI v. AKHTAR SULTAN 2014 PLD 78
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Local Government Department 2014 YLR 80
• ALI GHULAM v. MUHAMMAD MURAD 2014 PCrLJ 84
• AIJAZ HUSSAIN JAKHRANI v. ILLAHI BUX SOOMRO 2014 PLD 90

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

list of supreme court advocates from Piaro goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes