Find a Lawyer

PIYAR ALI versus AHSAN GONDHAL

A. VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suit Claim for application for dismissal of the claimant's claim was that the proceedings ceased to exist as a result of a fresh case. The plaintiff's dismissal request was also accepted simultaneously. The validity of the written statement for the plaintiff's rejection cannot be considered, which was filed for the declaration that the plaintiff was the owner of the registered sale deed suit property and could determine the validity of the legal proceedings. Is. Plaintiff's dismissal can be ruled out as inadmissible when no result could be obtained in respect of registered cell deed and entry of revenue record on the basis of the same plant when the cause of action was disclosed. When the wind was up, both the restraining orders were issued. The courts below were set aside and a remand was obtained for the prosecution

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• SUNDER JAKHRANI v. Haji MUHAMMAD NOOR 2014 PCrLJ 43
• IMRAN AHMED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law, Islamabad 2014 PLD 48
• FARAZ ALAM SOLANGI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Home Department 2014 MLD 52
• SULEMAN LALANI v. AL-ABBASS SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2014 CLD 52
• ROYAL AIRPORT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence 2014 PLD 60
• MURAD UR REHMAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 61
• QAMDEEN BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. v. Mrs. SHIRLEY AMIRUDDIN VALIKA 2014 YLR 66
• MUHAMMAD FEROZE PUNJANI v. Syed BADSHAH HUSSAIN 2014 PLD 70

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

famous supreme court advocate from Sialkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes