SHEIKH MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus ZAHEER AHMAD
Evidence XVII, Rr 2 and 3, There was no progress in the trial, despite six occasions over a one-year period for preparation of the non-production of the claim for non-production of the plaintiff, the trial court added the evidence The plaintiff's right to do so was sealed and the trial, judgment and order passed by the trial court, which was heard by the Lower Appellate Court, when the parties failed to appear on that day and the evidence When given time to present or cause the witness to appear, the court proceeded to decide the CPC case, under OXVII RR 2 and 3. The dog, the trial case was properly interpreted O XVII, RR 2 and 3, CPC which was maintained by the lower appellate court, there was no error by the trial court which led to the High Court. Decisions and interventions were approved by both courts. The revision maintained by the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the review was rejected in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Swat lawyer
